I see, thanks :-) ..Sorry, I got lost in that thread as to which descriptor was final :-)
On 4/15/07, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I pasted the whole modello file here http://rafb.net/p/E4CXrv28.html Regards, Raphaël 2007/4/15, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sorry, > > you can see in the sources > in the first comment of the archetype-descriptor-new.xml in > the archetypeng-archetype-descriptor project. > > It has been commented in the "plugin proposition" mail thread. > > I copy here: > <archetype id="archetype-artifact-id" partial="true|false" > > <requiredProperties> > <requiredProperty key="propKey" defaultValue="string to > replace" /> > </requiredProperties> > <fileSets> > <fileSet filtered="true|false" packaged="true|false" /> > <directory>src/main/java</directory> > <includes> > <include>**/*.java</include> > </includes> > <excludes> > <exclude>Main.java</exclude> > </excludes> > </fileSet> > </file-sets> > <modules> > <module id="module-artifact-id"> > <fileSets/> > <modules/> > </module> > </modules> > </archetype> > > 2007/4/15, Franz Allan Valencia See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Btw, what is the proposed new descriptor format? :-) > > > > On 4/13/07, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2007/4/9, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > On 8 Apr 07, at 10:41 PM 8 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote: > > > > > > > > > It seems apparent now that we should push forward with the ng > > > > > stuff. I was going to test if it is at least equivalent to trunk > > > > > and then propose bringing it in to replace trunk and start to plan > > > > > out 1.0 from there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't work the same yet, the mojos are just stubbed out and I > > > > have yet to get it to create an archetype though the tests are pretty > > > > good so far. > > > > > > Really please to ear ;) > > > > > > I will, starting from next week, refactor the descriptor as proposed. > > > > > > Raphaël > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone have any bandwidth to help with that? > > > > > > > > I will walk through the code in its entirety but not until next week. > > > > > > > > Jason. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Brett > > > > > > > > > > On 09/04/2007, at 12:37 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> On 3/4/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> The Archetype plugin has lost the ability to "package" non-Java > > > > >>> resources. It looks like this happened with the addition of 'sub > > > > >>> packages' for Java sources. > > > > >> > > > > >> ping. Any thoughts on whether the problem with "packaging" resources > > > > >> should be fixed in the existing archetype code or whether > > > > >> maven-archetypeng will be ready soon? > > > > >> > > > > >> It's http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-65 . > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Wendy > > > > >> > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
