but you depend on B, so you want B, not C ;)
On 6/6/07, Patrick Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right -- but B has no dependency on D, whereas C does. And C was builds
with 1.0.
On 6/6/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> B builds with 2.0, if you use B you should use it with whatever it was
> built. I think it's clear that B should use 2.0, or you are not using
> the "right" B
>
> On 6/6/07, Patrick Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I guess I am on the fence as to whether 2.0 is the correct version of D
> for
> > A to get.
> >
> > While B declares version 2.0 in its depMan section, we can't really be
> sure
> > of the intention of the developer if there is not a direct dependency on
> D
> > also listed in B. Maybe B is a parent project to X, Y, & Z -- they need
> > version 2.0 of D, and this is the only reason B lists D in depMan.
> >
> > From the example project, we can't be sure that B really cares which
> version
> > of D it gets, because it has no direct dependency on D.
> >
> >
> > On 6/6/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry for the 1950's Horror Movie Catchphrase. I'm just odd like that.
> ;-)
> > >
> > > The following has been filed as
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3038
> > > and I encourage discussion on this.
> > >
> > > I was recently working out some discrepancies between what maven
> client,
> > > mpir and archiva show as dependency tree's on some projects, and
> > > discovered something.
> > >
> > > MNG-1577 as discussed isn't done (yet).
> > >
> > > I created the teeny example project following the example that Carlos
> > > described on
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--vote--MNG-1577-as-the-default-behavior-p9506667s177.html
> > >
> > > | What about this use case for transitive dependencyManagement? has
> been
> > > tested?
> > > |
> > > | A -> B -> C -> D
> > > |
> > > | C depends on D 1.0
> > > | B has D 2.0 in dependencyManagement, no D in dependencies
> > > |
> > > | A should get D 2.0
> > >
> > > Source for project:
> > > http://joakim.erdfelt.com/maven/carlos_transitive_version.tar.gz
> > >
> > > I found that maven 2.0.6 does not handle this use case.
> > >
> > > When working on project A, i was expecting to see module D version 2.0
> > > in use, but didn't.
> > > Here's what I see in mvn -X clean package of module A.
> > >
> > > [DEBUG] net.example:A:jar:1.0 (selected for null)
> > > [DEBUG] Adding managed depedendencies for net.example:B
> > > [DEBUG] net.example:D:jar:2.0
> > > [DEBUG] net.example:B:jar:1.0:compile (selected for compile)
> > > [DEBUG] net.example:C:jar:1.0:compile (selected for compile)
> > > [DEBUG] net.example:D:jar:1.0:compile (selected for compile)
> > >
> > > That shows that D:2.0 is identified as being part of depMan.
> > >
> > > [DEBUG] Configuring mojo
> > > 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.0.2:compile' -->
> > > [DEBUG] (f) basedir =
> > >
> /home/joakim/code/experiments/deptree-mng-1577/carlos_transitive_version/A
> > > [DEBUG] (f) buildDirectory =
> > >
> > >
>
/home/joakim/code/experiments/deptree-mng-1577/carlos_transitive_version/A/target
> > > [DEBUG] (f) classpathElements =
> > >
> > >
>
[/home/joakim/code/experiments/deptree-mng-1577/carlos_transitive_version/A/target/classes,
> > > /home/joakim/.m2/repository/net/example/D/1.0/D-1.0.jar,
> > > /home/joakim/.m2/repository/net/example/B/1.0/B-1.0.jar,
> > > /home/joakim/.m2/repository/net/example/C/1.0/C-1.0.jar]
> > > [DEBUG] (f) compileSourceRoots =
> > >
> > >
>
[/home/joakim/code/experiments/deptree-mng-1577/carlos_transitive_version/A/src/main/java]
> > > [DEBUG] (f) compilerId = javac
> > > [DEBUG] (f) debug = true
> > >
> > > That shows that the compiler plugin is using D:1.0 as part of the
> > > compiler plugin.
> > >
> > > This has been reviewed by Carlos and Brian on irc as not implemented
> > > correctly on maven client.
> > >
> > > --
> > > - Joakim Erdfelt
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Open Source Software (OSS) Developer
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
