On 6 Jun 07, at 11:15 PM 6 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 07/06/2007, at 1:02 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 6/6/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since this is not urgent, as you mentioned, we can afford to wait
until a time when we don't have two active branches in development
that share patches.
Still learning... two active branches? Which ones?
We have trunk (2.1-SNAPSHOT), and maven-2.0.x (2.0.7-SNAPSHOT).
I don't grok the API discussions much, but I'm +1 on avoiding
filename
changes when you have two active branches AND you are planning to
merge them.
Well, we've already collapsed whole modules, so I wouldn't say it's
a showstopper - but I agree it's something that needs to be taken
into consideration so that choices are made more carefully.
I didn't change any package names, and I can still easily patch as
demonstrated over the last week.
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
