Many other pieces probably assume the extension based on the type. I think it could be troublesome to have packaging type "jar" but configure the jar plugin to create ".bean"
-----Original Message----- From: Adam Warski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 4:59 PM To: [email protected] Subject: A simple improvement of the jar plugin Hello, I would like to suggest a simple improvement of the jar plugin: a new property, specifying the artifact extension (it is now a hardcoded ".jar"). There are some cases where it would be useful to change it --- for example when creating a jboss microcontainer archive, which is simply a jar with a .beans extension. I have done some research, and I think the only way to have a ".beans" packaging is to write a plugin. This is quite simple, but could be much simpler :) -- Regards, Adam Warski --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
