I'm with you, I think a 3.0 would make more sense ;) specially if it keeps evolving from 1.0.0 and gets to 2.0, 2.0.1..., then it'd be really confusing
On 8/14/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whatever works, it just seemed like a confusing move to me...but > then, I am often confused by things that others just "get". :-) > > -j > > On Aug 13, 2007, at 4:52 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > > > On 13 Aug 07, at 8:03 PM 13 Aug 07, John Casey wrote: > > > >> But I thought the whole point of the major version number was to > >> track the progression of the project as a concept...that is, a set > >> of logically evolving specifications and behaviors. The whole > >> point here is that Maven's artifact behavior is not new. In fact, > >> we're starting the third major iteration of this work. I think it > >> makes much more sense to capture that fact. > >> > >> In the end, it's not critical one way or the other, but I think > >> it's pointless to have a major version number as such if we're not > >> going to use it. > >> > > > > We've never had an independent release. We'll release 3.0, and > > folks will probably ask where 1 and 2 went. I ultimately don't > > care, 1.0-S was most consistent to me. > > > >> -john > >> > >> On Aug 12, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> On 13 Aug 07, at 1:02 AM 13 Aug 07, John Casey wrote: > >>> > >>>> I think the move is a good idea, especially since it means > >>>> formally decoupling the release cycles. Just one question: why > >>>> drop the version? If this is a total rewrite of the code, then > >>>> isn't a 3.0 more in order than going all the way back to 1.0? > >>>> The behaviors and specs for artifacts are still relatively well > >>>> defined, and won't change that significantly, after all. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I just always default something "new" to 1.0-S. The artifact > >>> interfaces probably won't change much, but I see the guts > >>> changing quite a bit. > >>> > >>>> -john > >>>> > >>>> On Aug 12, 2007, at 2:47 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I have separated out maven-artifact into its own module here: > >>>>> > >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-artifact > >>>>> > >>>>> I will attempt to use it in trunk mid week, and right now I > >>>>> have change the groupId to org.apache.maven.artifact. > >>>>> > >>>>> Do we need to change the name of the artifactId to prevent > >>>>> confusion? The groupId should prevent any dependency clashes, > >>>>> but the name being the same may cause some confusion. I was > >>>>> also going to drop the version back to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT (start > >>>>> using major, minor, micro). > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Jason > >>>>> > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> Jason van Zyl > >>>>> Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven > >>>>> jason at sonatype dot com > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>> --- > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> --- > >>>> John Casey > >>>> Committer and PMC Member, Apache Maven > >>>> mail: jdcasey at commonjava dot org > >>>> blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/john > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Jason > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Jason van Zyl > >>> Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven > >>> jason at sonatype dot com > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> - > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >> > >> --- > >> John Casey > >> Committer and PMC Member, Apache Maven > >> mail: jdcasey at commonjava dot org > >> blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/john > >> > >> > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jason > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Jason van Zyl > > Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven > > jason at sonatype dot com > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --- > John Casey > Committer and PMC Member, Apache Maven > mail: jdcasey at commonjava dot org > blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/john > > > -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
