On 21 Aug 07, at 5:01 PM 21 Aug 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
I'm not fan of featuritis, but it sounded like a valid use case, and
since it gives the same net effect and doesn't affect any backwards
compatibility I thought it was worth going ahead with.
Same here. There is already a concept of attached artifacts and
there is
a parameter for an alternateDeployRepo, this is just expanding a
little
to combine those comcepts.
This is for the whole deployment of said artifact. Not to split up
the deployment. Everything we do assumes joint deployment and I see
zero value in allowing the separation and just makes everything
related to the relationship between primary and secondary artifacts
harder. Based on the coordinate of the primary you should be able to
find/search for the secondaries. We'll just end up with a clusterfuck
changing that.
--Brian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
