On 29 Aug 07, at 8:41 AM 29 Aug 07, Mark Hobson wrote:
On 29/08/2007, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would very much like to try and get both versions of Maven to use
it. If at all possibly we should try this and between you, myself,
Patrick and Ralph we can probably determine if this is possible. If
we decide we have to mimic bugs then it might not be worth it. But I
would definitely consolidate your work in the separated maven-
artifact as that's what 2.1 is using now.
Cool, that sounds good. I haven't checked the differences between
maven-artifact in 2.0.x and 2.1.x, but I assume the remaining work is
to integrate it into 2.0.x? I'd be happy to help if I can find some
free time. Let me know the plans.
There should not be very many differences. I think it amounts to a
few fixes and the work you've done. The changes you've made should be
integrated into maven-artifact 3.0-S. I think we all agree on this.
At that point all the code should be in one place.
When it is we can determine if we can feasibly use the same code base
in 2.1.x and 2.0.x. I do not know yet if this is possible. I hope it is.
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
