If you document it for the users of the build, I wouldn't consider
that a hack :)
On 21/12/2007, at 7:34 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
That's hacking your pom.xml, and hacks are bad ;-)
On Dec 21, 2007 6:51 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's always the one shot:
<artifactId>maven-surefire-configuration</artifactId>
<configuration>
<skipExec>${cheat}</skipExec>
</configuration>
...
<properties>
<cheat>false</cheat>
</properties>
...
then:
mvn -Dcheat=true test
On 21/12/2007, at 5:46 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
cool.
It's not just me, but hoards of developers who's hands will now be
saved from RSI due to excessive typing
;-)
On Dec 21, 2007 3:35 AM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stephen Connolly wrote:
Can we make the property shorter and easier to remember...
that's what I liked about the -Dtest=0 hack
Just for you, I've filed SUREFIRE-417 (Make new "skipTests"
parameter to
replace skipExec). ;-)
I've got to fix SUREFIRE-416 anyway, and I'd forgotten that this
has
always bothered me. :-)
"mvn -DskipTests" is short enough, right? I thought about making
it
"skipTest" but I thought it might sound like we were skipping the
entire
"test" lifecycle phase...?
-Dan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
