>It's ugly, but there is a workaround for this now in respecifying the >URLs in the child POMs. It's a pain but it's not the end of the world >and I'd say better than adding even more voodoo.
Most people would say this isn't an acceptable workaround. >I would say that's the best way to go - keep >behaving the same way as now for 4.0.0 POMs, and come up with a better >solution for people that choose to use 4.1.0 POMs (once they are in >place). I'm leaning this way but I was hoping we could find some solution. It is a popular issue and I'd hate to just punt it. Anyone else have a suggestion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
