On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Does this bundle have the same bits as the legal-bundle from genesis
> does?

Mostly yes.   It's the same stuff, but with a couple of extra parameters 
I added to allow the poms to inject some extra header/footer stuff if 
wanted/needed.   The "normal" result is the same as the genesis stuff (I 
think since David was the one to submit it).

Dan



> --jason
>
> On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:05 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss,
> > we need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
> >
> > The only change is really the result of discussions and testing
> > around:
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRRESOURCES-32
> > Many thanks to David Jencks for leading that up with legal-discuss.
> >
> > Staging area:
> > http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage-bundle/
> >
> > Tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/resources/tags/apache-jar-reso
> >urce-bundle-1.4/
> >
> > Vote open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1
> >
> > --
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> > Principal Engineer, IONA
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to