Ok i now see what problems are. 2008/4/15, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/4/15, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I found a regression in :generate - > > 1) the default (15) is no longer present > > This is not intended.
This is a side effect of the new version of the internal catalog. Brett, may you please create a issue for it, i think we can live with that known bug and schedule it for alpha-4. If any one see it as a show stopper, i will fix it. > > > > 2) it no longer prompts for the groupId/etc - it goes straight to using > > some default settings > > This is partially intended. > the plugin now provides default for all values and > should ask for confirmation if everithing is correctly set. What the archetype plugin do is this: a. it ask for the archetype to use (il the list) b. It then guess sensible default values for common properties and additional properties. c. It then ask for any unguessed value. d. It then ask for confirmation about what was guessed/asked Yes this means that it only ask for confirmation when it guess all (common properties are always guessed) e. If it is not confirmed, it ask for each property a new values (proposing to keep the guessed value) I think this could is a better behaviour than before and permit to an user creating an archetype to provide some default values even for the common properties (like a default groupId in a corporate environment) If no one object on 1, i plan the current vote to stay open 72 hour more. In case of a blocker, i will fix and reschedule a vote thereafter. Thanks, Raphaël > > > > > > Is that intended? > > > > I did find a bad license header here: > > > archetype-common/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/archetype/test/InternalCatalogFromWiki.java, > > but it's not a blocker. > > Do you have a tool for checking the license? or did you check by hand > each files? > > > > > > I also noticed that some of the code from Better Builds with Maven is > > reproduced here with the company name changed - I don't see this as a > > problem (it's just sample POMs), but I think it's worth being reminded that > > care should be taken if something is being copied from an external source. > > Which code exactly, i don't remember having grabed code from the book. > > > > > > I'll leave it up to you whether any are blockers. You have my +1 if you > > choose to go ahead. > > I will check tonite for issues 1 and 2. > > But we currently have only 2 non binding and 1 binding vote which > is not enough IIRC. > > Thanks > > > Raphaël > > > > > > Cheers, > > Brett > > > > > > On 11/04/2008, at 6:22 AM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We solved 20 issues: > > > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11095&styleName=Html&version=14088 > > > > > > Staging repo: > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~rafale/archetype-stage-repository/ > > > > > > Staging site: > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-archetype-plugin-2.0-alpha-3 > > > > > > Guide to testing staged releases: > > > > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html > > > > > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > > > > > [ ] +1 > > > [ ] +0 > > > [ ] -1 > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Raphaël > > > > > > > -- > > Brett Porter > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
