You could always namespace off system properties that should be passed to the forked process, e.g. -Dtest.foo=bar would pass in -Dfoo=bar.
Mark 2008/5/2 Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Brett Porter wrote: > > > > I thought I had commented on this at some point, but I don't really > remember. > > > > You're plan of action sounds correct if there's no way around it. You > might however look into the changes John made in 2.0.9 to separate CLI > properties from existing system properties - maybe we can just support it > under 2.0.9 using these? > > > > Hmm. Good suggestion... it looks like in 2.0.8 the user properties were > just being dumped into the execution properties together with the system > properties; now in 2.0.9 they're carried forward to the MavenProjectBuilder > where they're used for model interpolation... but then we don't make them > available as a map for plugin use. > > Instead of "Won't Fix", I'll mark SUREFIRE-121 Future, I guess. :-) > > > > -Dan > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
