+1 :)

On 26/08/2008, at 1:57 PM, John Casey wrote:

I'm okay with making the current RC a first milestone toward 2.1.0, if we know what the endgame for 2.1.0 is. How do we know when we're done? Also, can we focus on having a 2.1.0 GA out in the next two or so months? It's been since April that we had a release, and that one had some pretty big problems that are keeping people away. I don't want to set the bar too high on these releases, especially when there's so little development time to go around. IMO, if we can start out with *some* success, we can build off of that and keep things moving. Personally, I'd much rather see 3-4 new features every three months in a GA release, instead of 12-16 new features in a year. It also gives us a much better chance of making our releases stable and predictable.

As far as the performance problems on the 2.1.x branch, that's on my todo list for tomorrow, to merge in my changes from the RC branch to get the 2.1.x branch back up to snuff. Sorry that's been slow coming (no pun intended) but I'm starting to get caught up WRT SVN syncing now, so hopefully tomorrow will be the day.

As far as supporting 3 codelines, my own thought is to keep 2.0.x on life support long enough to get a GA release of 2.1 out (and maybe a little longer, I don't know what's really feasible here), but not to spend too much time spit-shining 2.0.x anymore. If we can find a way to fix the most broken features without bringing down the rest of that house of cards, then that'll be good enough for me.

Brett, Christian, I think JIRA voting is a great way to "weight" the survey results with the users' priorities, but I want to make sure we have an alternate mechanism that allows us to talk about features - which will be sets of JIRA issues, in reality - outside of an issue-tracking context. We need to use Confluence for this sort of work, writing proposals that can be reviewed and voted on, IMO. I was just thinking that Dennis' use of the survey system was a great idea, and could be a perfect fit for this sort of planning.

-john

--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to