+0.99 for 1 +0.01 for 2 I really like 2.0.10 to be 2.1.0-M1 but i dislike the name i would prefer 2.1.0-beta-1 I don't have found any document stating which pre x.y.z (with x, y, z integers) standard maven follows.
Raphaël 2008/8/29, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Okay, > > Let's put it to a vote. We have two options: > > 1. Release the current release candidate as milestone 1 of the 2.1.0 > codeline. The version for this release would be 2.1.0-M1. > > The advantage of this approach is that it keeps is (relatively) focused on > only three simultaneous codebases, not four. It provides a stable foundation > for building out a small set of new features for a final GA release of > 2.1.0. This release will have no new features, and its only goal is backward > compatibility with the maximum stability possible. To me, this isn't enough > to distinguish it from 2.0.x. However, the implementation details are such > that it deserves to be separate. > > The disadvantage is that a -M1 release may not attract as many users, and > the performance/stability gains may not be compelling enough to overcome the > psychological barrier of moving from 2.0.9 to 2.1.0-M1. > > 2. Release the current release candidate as 2.1.0 GA. > > The advantage here is that the work we've put into stabilizing this RC is > probably more worth of a GA release, and by calling it 2.1.0 we can tell our > users how solid we think it is. Additionally, calling this 2.1.0 means that > the only thing we could do for 2.1.1, 2.1.2, etc. would be to fix any > regressions that cropped up without adding risk from new features. > > The major disadvantage is that it will mean that some of us are adding new > features to 2.2.0 (parent-versioning, reactor changes, etc.) while others > are trying to push out regression fixes on 2.0.x and 2.1.x, while still > others are introducing large-scale changes on the 3.0.x branch. I'm > personally not sure we can drive four parallel codelines to release in a > timely manner. > > So, let's vote. Just indicate whether you support #1 or #2. > > My vote is for #1. > > Thanks, > > -john > > -- > John Casey > Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org) > Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
