On 04/10/2008, at 1:41 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote:

James,

James William Dumay wrote:
Hey Oleg,
Curious, will the Mecury wagon provider be the new handler for the dav:
protocol extension?

Yes - Mercury replaces a dav protocol wagon handler if this is the question.

It does not claim to handle entire DAV protocol, including versioning, etc. It implements a subset that allows to PUT resources to the server: see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg77266.html from Jesse. So Mercury transport handles two-way (PUT and GET) transactions over http and https.

Yep, it's really just the MKCOL that is important for the standard DAV servers that by default won't create directories automatically. The solution Jesse has in place is basically the same as the existing WebDAV clients, as they don't do any particular locking or other DAV features either.

- Brett



Thanks,
Oleg
Cheers
James

On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 22:34 -0700, Oleg Gusakov wrote:

I have been testing Mercury wagon provider with 2.2.x and 2.1.x branches and successfully pass all the ITs but one, please see the tracking comments in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MERCURY-8 and it's subtasks

The missing test - it0031 - deals with plugin alias remapping, which happens well above wagon provider. Plus it also fails with the old providers in place, so I don't think it's an obstacle.

I will stage Mercury wagon tomorrow and post notification on this list. I think it's ready for 2.1.0-M2 consumption.

Thanks,
Oleg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to