Huh? The last attempt at 2.0.10 was months ago and this one was just sitting around doing nothing ever since. The bandwagon gets too full whenever it's release time and nothing happens in between, which is why we introduced the process for the RC.
-----Original Message----- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 10:15 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [RC] Moving forward with 2.0.10 I agree but I find the first RC was out quickly without giving the time to review the bugs we wanted to fix in this version. It's not a big problem. We'll fix it in the .11. I'm preparing an IT. Arnaud On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Brian Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arnaud, the idea is to limit the scope to new regressions once we start an > RC. Otherwise we would spin in circles forever. > > --Brian (mobile) > > > > On Oct 29, 2008, at 2:04 AM, "Arnaud HERITIER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > ok brett, >> >> I'll try to create a testcase without seam. >> >> Even if we try to improve the quality of our releases I think we have to >> fix >> any issue that we find in 2.0.x in a bug fix and not only bugs we >> introduced >> in a bug fix release. >> >> From the beginning we should have apply only bugs fixes on 2.0.x and put >> changes (mirrors, ..) or new features (import scope, ...) in a new minor >> release (2.x). >> >> That's why I didn't check on which version it was a regression. It's just >> a >> bug in 2.0.x. >> >> Thanks for your help. >> >> I'll submit the IT in few days. >> >> Arnaud >> >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:46 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi Arnaud, >>> >>> The issue didn't make it clear that this is actually a regression from >>> 2.0.8 -> 2.0.9. It'd be helpful to have an IT for this that doesn't rely >>> on Seam to be able to get it fixed. I'd be a little reluctant to make a >>> dep >>> change this far along in 2.0.10, since it's not a regression from 2.0.9 >>> -> >>> 2.0.10, but it should certainly be fixed either for 2.0.10 or early >>> 2.0.11. >>> >>> - Brett >>> >>> On 29/10/2008, at 6:42 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: >>> >>> MNG-3775 <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3775> is also more than >>> >>>> >>>> annoying >>>> We added a testcase and I can try to create an IT if necessary. >>>> >>>> >>>> Arnaud >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Benjamin Bentmann < >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Brian E. Fox wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please try it out and see if we have any remaining regressions over >>>>> >>>>> 2.0.9. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not a regression but would nicely fit our efforts to stabilize >>>>> things: >>>>> While investigating why 2.0.10-RC1 passed the IT MNG-3599 for Brett but >>>>> not >>>>> for me, I discovered MNG-3805. It's just another issue about using >>>>> LinkedHashSet/-Map vs. HashSet/-Map. I have by now both a proposed >>>>> patch >>>>> and >>>>> the IT available. >>>>> >>>>> So, if somebody considers it sensible, we could additionally fix >>>>> - MNG-3805 >>>>> - MNG-3424 >>>>> - MNG-3599 >>>>> for 2.0.10. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Benjamin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> .......................................................... >>>> Arnaud HERITIER >>>> .......................................................... >>>> OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com >>>> www.octo.com | blog.octo.com >>>> .......................................................... >>>> ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org >>>> www.apache.org | maven.apache.org >>>> ........................................................... >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Brett Porter >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> .......................................................... >> Arnaud HERITIER >> .......................................................... >> OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com >> www.octo.com | blog.octo.com >> .......................................................... >> ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org >> www.apache.org | maven.apache.org >> ........................................................... >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- .......................................................... Arnaud HERITIER .......................................................... OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .......................................................... ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ........................................................... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
