+1 It's too difficult to follow what it is done in 2.0.X, 2.X and 3.X in the same time without working on it every day.
Arnaud On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote: > > On Dec 15, 2008, at 7:41 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> >> >> Also in the course of 6 months of development of the model-builder we have >> not had a single contribution from anyone else. Zero interest. So yes, it is >> easier to release elsewhere and that has allowed me to patch, test, release >> in rapid succession to try and get the alpha-1 to the point of release. >> >> > I wouldn't say "zero interest". I simply have found it impossible to keep > up with all the svn commits in all the various branches. Furthermore, a lot > of stuff was being worked on in somewhat private branches. Unless they ask > for collaboration I'm not going to go review stuff in someone's private > sandbox until they call out and say it is ready for review before merging. > > Ralph > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- .......................................................... Arnaud HERITIER 12 guidelines to boost your productivity with a Java software factory - http://tinyurl.com/56s9tw .......................................................... OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .......................................................... ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ...........................................................
