I don't think it's wise to EOL a product without a GA replacement. It's true that because 2.1 is in milestone releases it is not usable by many people in an "approved" managerial environment, but, to the same token, it's not feature complete either.
Personally speaking, I definitely am eagerly awaiting the issues scheduled in 2.0.11. Please continue releasing 2.0.x until 2.1/3.0 has a GA. Paul > On 28/01/2009, at 9:03 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: > >> Normally I would agree on the late change, but it's entirely optional >> usage so it wouldn't affect existing builds and I'd like to start >> thinking about 2.0.10 being the EOL for 2.0.x. > > Given there's already been a good number of fixes for 2.0.11 that haven't > been rolled up to 2.0.10-RC, maybe pushing 2.0.10 out as is and having .11 > as the EOL is a better way to go - wdyt? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
