And can't we have an option to deactivate it in 2.1 ? If it works like expected we'll remove it in 3.0
(I continue to be in favor to have tests, but it's really difficult to have a good coverage it can be a cheap solution) Arnaud On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu > wrote: > Don Brown wrote: > > Do you have tests that pull down multiple dependencies? >> > > Yes, but AFAICT only dependencies from the same group id. > > If yes, you do have test coverage. [...] I'm not >> saying more test coverage isn't a good thing, just that this >> functionality probably does have coverage. >> > > The issue with parallelism are things like race conditions, > deadlock-free synchronization etc. Unless one has full control over the > interleaved execution of the parallel threads, those aspects can usually > not be checked from a test. > > > Benjamin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- Arnaud
