2009/5/22 Jason van Zyl <[email protected]>
>
>
>> It'd be nice if it was a feature... but I suspect it is a bug...
>>
>>
> The mojos are binding to phase declared in the annotations. Why do you
> think this would be a bug?
>
Because I have not seen it documented anywhere else before... so before I go
running off telling people "just do this" I wanted to establish if this
behaviour will still work for Maven 3.x...
I am not entirely happy with the syntax myself.... and Brian (on IRC) felt
that an execution [with no phase and two goals which are bound to two
different phases] was ugly and unintuative... which I tend to agree
But if you are chiming in and saying "Oh but of course and Maven 3.x will
explicitly support such a syntax" then I will switch my examples from
<executions>
<execution>
<id>integration-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>verify</id>
<goals>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
to
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
and rejoyce
-Stephen
