On 24/03/2010, at 5:43 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote: >> In the release docs [1], there is nothing about removing the staged >> documentation directory after it is completed. This means we have a lot of >> versioned directories of plugin sites, but they are never linked to. Should >> they be removed? > > No. People don't always use the latest release of every plugin, it's > very useful to have the exact docs for your version available so you > can see what options there are. > > There was some discussion of linking to them, probably two years ago > or whenever we started doing this, but we never decided how to do it. > I was hesitant to add another task to the RM's already long list. :( > > I use those docs, but I "just know" where they are. They are official > docs IMO, not really "staged" (even though that's how they get there, > I subverted the staging url to avoid changing the config that was > already in the poms.)
In what instances do you find you need to use them? I thought for plugins, with the use of @since and similar descriptive text it wasn't needed. - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
