Well, weave mode doesn't work for CXF. Ends up with a NullPointerException down in antrun-plugin someplace. Thus, I cannot help you there.
For CXF on my i7 820QM (4 cores, 8 threads) turning off checkstyle/pmd and having everything already code generated/compiled (so mostly just running tests) Linear: 26 minutes Parallel: 9 minutes (-T 12 is what I'm using) Dan On Friday 11 June 2010 12:24:13 pm Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > I am picking up some positive tweets here and there, but I'd be really > happy if those of you who test parallel building could report back with > some numbers in response to this message. I am particularly interested > in the difference between parallel and weave (and linear too), mostly to > assess that weave is worth the effort. > > So after tweaking around with threads a bit to find out what runs > fastest I'd really enjoy reports like this one (real data): > > Linear: 50 seconds > Parallel: 40 seconds > Weave: 29 seconds > For a 10 module project using -T 1C on a 6 core box. > > > For those wondering: > * Both parallel and weave favorize projects with lots of modules > and "wide" dependency graphs. > * Weave is /probably/ quite a lot faster than parallel for projects > with lots of tests fairly evenly distributed among the modules. > * Putting all your tests in one module is a bad idea in this context. > * Some mojos (like war/ear) can "dwarf" all the others, > effectively limiting the overall potential somewhat. > > Kristian > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
