A patch in JIRA would be great. Most of this is a leftover - when the plugins started, they were to be contrasted with "Maven 1", which had typically been labelled "Maven X plugin". They never got updated.
As far as I'm concerned, we should drop the "2" wherever we can. "Maven" refers to supported versions of Maven - those being 2.0.11, 2.2.1, and 3.0 :) Cheers, Brett On 14/10/2010, at 11:48 AM, Ed Staub wrote: > The http://maven.apache.org/plugins documentation for several/many/most of > the plugins refer to themselves as being Maven 2 plugins. > > If it will help, I'll file issues on this under Jira, but I'm not sure > where. Does this generally mean: > > - the website is out of date? > > - the plugin documentation just needs to updated to say Maven 3? If so, > should it say "Maven 2/3" to cue Maven2 users that it's correct for them, > too? > > - the plugin documentation is just plain out of date - more needs to be > fixed? > > - the plugin isn't known to work under Maven 3? > > Because I've been paying attention, I'm pretty sure "plugin isn't known to > work" is not true for any mainstream plugins. But a newbie isn't going to > know that. Their assumption will be that Maven 3 is a lot less baked than > it is. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
