On 2010-11-01 22:33, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Nov 1, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> +1. >> I can be a volunteer for site stuff.. >> >> Question : what do we do with site plugin 2.x and 3.x branch ? >> >> Personnally : I'd like to move only 3.x branch in this new project. >> >> > > I would suggest these are the plugins that go as part of the site generation:
To see which plugins are on the table go to http://maven.apache.org/plugins/index.html and check the "Type" column. If a plugin has an "R" in that column it is site related. Plugins that have "B+R" can be difficult to divide into two plugins in an easy way. Parts of the code is shared between the "build" part and the "reporting" part of the plugin. If the code is splitable, the reporting part could form a new plugin called "Old Name *Report* Plugin", like we have for Surefire. > maven-changelog-plugin > maven-changes-plugin No sure how to handle the announcement stuff in there. > maven-checkstyle-plugin Contains possible build-breaking hooks. > maven-doap-plugin > maven-javadoc-plugin For me this is part of the build as much as it is the site, since we attach the javadocs when deploying artifacts. > maven-linkcheck-plugin > maven-pdf-plugin > maven-pmd-plugin Contains possible build-breaking hooks. > maven-project-info-reports-plugin > maven-site-plugin > maven-source-plugin Has nothing to do with the site. > >> 2010/11/1 Jason van Zyl <[email protected]>: >>> In much the same way we have a little sub-project for releasing I think >>> it's time to have one for the site generation. Take the maven-site-plugin >>> and any related plugins and move them into their own tree. What I'm trying >>> to do here is cull the set of plugins we have is to keep the ones that are >>> part of the core lifecycles and super popular plugins that get maintained >>> like the dependency plugin and enforcer plugin. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jason >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>> Jason van Zyl >>> Founder, Apache Maven >>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. >>> No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. >>> They know it is going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically >>> dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of >>> dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or >>> goals are in doubt. >>> >>> -- Robert Pirzig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> http://twitter.com/olamy >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > -- Dennis Lundberg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
