+1 for the retirement language
I'm confused about the creation language too, but I'm guessing that's
just a sidetrack. For retirement this seems okay, but I'd also urge the
injection of a relocation POM instead of a final release...for the
reasons already covered (related to releasing from a SCM location that's
not supposed to exist any more).
For creation, I'd urge us to stick to the sandbox-promotion model, since
I think it works well.
On 12/16/10 6:19 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
+0.9
The proposal starts off talking about creation and retirement and then
speaks exclusively about retirement on step 2 and then step 3 is back
to both.
I'd like to see a clearer outline for creation
-Stephen
On 15 December 2010 21:52, Dennis Lundberg<denn...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi
No one objected to the proposal I made on November 1. Jason and I have
polished the proposal based on the comments that were made. The final
(?) version can be found here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposal+--+A+creation+and+retirement+plan+for+plugins
Please vote on whether we should make this proposal our policy.
[ ] +1 Let's use it
[ ] -1 No way
If the vote succeeds I'll put it on the Maven site somewhere.
Suggestions on where to put are welcome.
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
--
John Casey
Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
Blog: http://www.johnofalltrades.name/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
