I didn't yet test it but it is a good direction to follow.

Arnaud

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> looks promising!
>
> I'm sure I miss big parts of the picture, but please allow me a few
> (probably dumb) questions.
>
> This means that an artifact is uniquely identified via the URL of the
> server we downloaded it from? What about distributing artifacts to different
> locations? Kind of a redundancy for maven.central. Is this already targeted
> (and I don't see it yet), or a completely different story?
>
> If artifacts (+pom+-...) served from different locations have the same
> sha-1, then I won't bother where to take it from (albeit they must be
> 'reachable' aka available in at least one enabled repo).
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> --- On Sat, 2/19/11, nicolas de loof <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: nicolas de loof <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Auto-Mirror Selection for Maven 3.x
> > To: "Maven Developers List" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "Stephen Connolly" <[email protected]>, "John Casey" <
> [email protected]>
> > Date: Saturday, February 19, 2011, 8:57 AM
> > I really like this feature suggest,
> > and it would be a must-have if also
> > backported to maven2 !
> >
> > Having to maintain mirroring based on declared repositories
> > ID is a pain,
> > especially when transitive dependencies pull multiple IDs
> > for the same repo
> > URL. From your schema, it seems the routing rules are based
> > on target URL,
> > that would solve this with a centralized setup.
> >
> > I'll take a look at code ASAP.
> > Nicolas
> >
> > 2011/2/19 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>
> >
> > > Yep
> > >
> > > On 18 February 2011 22:39, John Casey <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > So you're saying it would work with existing
> > releases of Maven, like
> > > 2.2.1?
> > > > I'd be very interested to see that.
> > > >
> > > > -john
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2/18/11 5:23 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I'll have a look at your branch, but I have
> > an alternative proposal that
> > > >> can
> > > >> (I think) be made to work for any version of
> > maven, perhaps ivy too all
> > > by
> > > >> just dropping a jar into the lib folder...
> > I'll have to flesh it out to
> > > >> confirm my theory. I'll be on two long
> > flights at the start of march, so
> > > I
> > > >> hope to be able to share something the 2nd
> > week march
> > > >>
> > > >> - Stephen
> > > >>
> > > >> ---
> > > >> Sent from my Android phone, so random
> > spelling mistakes, random nonsense
> > > >> words and other nonsense are a direct result
> > of using swype to type on
> > > the
> > > >> screen
> > > >> On 18 Feb 2011 22:10, "John Casey"<[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > --
> > > > John Casey
> > > > Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
> > > > Blog: http://www.johnofalltrades.name/
> > > >
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to