The later, I think. Is it reasonable to simply ditch FastMap from the bridge, and plan to add a javolution dependency to each place we find a use of FastMap? That would be my recommendation now that you ask.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > why not copy their tests... or are you suggesting that the replacement > is to use the class directly? > > On 12 June 2011 21:01, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is just a copy of a class from javolution with the package name >> changed. Javolution is BSD licensed. So, I propose to add the >> dependency, create a pass-through class in the plexus package, and >> write no tests, on the theory that the javolution people have adequate >> tests for themselves. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
