-1 for same reasons, but I'd be happy to switch to a +1 if the license was 
changed back to dual Eclipse/Apache AND it gets to Eclipse.

Dan


On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:04:42 PM John Casey wrote:
> -1
> 
> Definitely not until it's all the way moved to Eclipse...and even then,
> I'm personally reluctant.
> 
> I'd much prefer to see Aether's functionality moved back into Maven, and
> streamlined to the point where it's easier to maintain.
> 
> On 7/27/11 2:45 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > As per the approved policy, this message opens a vote to allow Maven
> > releases to depend on EPL (and thus Category B) versions of Aether.
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours and the results determined
> > according to the policy. Discussion on this question took place on a
> > thread labelled '[DISCUSS] incorporate EPL Aether'.
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to