Le samedi 27 août 2011, Benson Margulies a écrit :
> The doxia 1.2 POM has some rather surprising things in it. Notably,
> the dependencyManagement picks up the version of the current project,
> so they all tend to turn into 1.0-SNAPSHOT.
yes, I saw it even if I don't understand how/why it does that
AFAIK, the problem is on Doxia Tools only, isn't it?

> 
> There's also the build.directory reference which leads to warnings.
I didn't notice this one: what is it?

> 
> Mayhap it would be possible to make a release just to fix this?
Did you understand why it is causing such problems? is it fixed in actual 
trunk?

In fact, a new version of Doxia Converter should be done independently from 
these problems, as the actual 1.2 uses Doxia 1.1.2, and even more: it not only 
*uses* but *contains* the dependencies in its jar-with-dependencies classifier. 
Then we need a Doxia Converter version with Doxia 1.2.

But what version number should we give?
We had already this question, but now it seems to me we made the wrong 
decision.
We have 3 parts:
- Doxia (core), with its modules for document and output formats
- Doxia Sitetools, to make sites or plain documents
- Doxia Tools, with CLI tools (converter and linkcheck)

For the moment, Doxia and Doxia Sitetools have the same versions.
Doxia Tools has a different version (1.2) than the Doxia version included 
(1.1.2)

IMHO, Doxia Sitetools version should be decoupled from Doxia version, since 
the code does not really depends from Doxia version, and they are simply 
components for different features than Doxia (used by m-site-p and m-pdf-p 
mainly).
But Doxia Tools version should stick with Doxia version, or add a suffix when 
multiple Doxia Tools versions are done for only one Doxia version, since these 
are CLI tools for end-users to use Doxia: without this, end-users can't 
understand (even us...).

So IMHO we should release Doxia Tools 1.1.2, which is a fixed version of actual 
1.2 regarding the problems we actually found.
Then release Doxia Tools 1.2.0.1 with Doxia 1.2 dependency.

WDYT?

Regards,

Hervé

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to