In wagon-2 we approximately doubled the number of tests. I even finally activated the TCK which John wrote some time ago.
But what we miss imo are tests for the integration of wagon in maven core itself. I think it's definitely worth a try, but we should be aware that we might get some corner cases where lightweight still works better. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org> > To: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org> > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 8:38 PM > Subject: Re: MNG-5175 : replace wagon http lightweight with wagon http 2.0 > > I assume all the ITs pass with this change? > > On Sep 17, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> With WAGON-348, the wagon-http based on Apache HttpClient include now >> http connection pool mechanism. >> This prevent creating http(s) connection for each artifacts requests ! >> The patch simply remove lightweight and replace it with a shaded jar >> of wagon http with classes relocation of dependencies. >> >> If no objections, I will commit this. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> Talend : http://talend.com >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
