We've had some commonly agreed upon practices for some time, but it wasn't really written down. I think with labels now available instead of versions we can do a better job, which was the crux of Benson's post.
Probably the thing to do is for someone to write it up from that thread, and we can use / evolve from there. On 23/09/2011, at 9:46 AM, Barrie Treloar wrote: > Do we have a triage process documented? > > I can see Bensons post re:Maven core JIRA triage starting > http://maven-users.828.n2.nabble.com/Maven-core-JIRA-triage-starting-tp6494353p6494353.html > > And I was about to embark on the same thing for m-eclipse-p, and not > wanting to re-invent a new process I went looking to see if someone > had done this before me. > I can't find anything, but that doesn't mean people haven't thought > about this previously. > > I was thinking about creating marker versions like: > * Assessed > * Rejected > So I can tell the difference between new bugs and ones that have had > someone at least look over them. > > Guidance most welcome. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org