Nice!
-Robert
Op Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:44:56 +0200 schreef Simone Tripodi
<[email protected]>:
Thanks for the feedbacks guys, I just quickly took care about it, see
MSKINS-61
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Tony Chemit <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:22:56 +0200
Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:
2012/8/22 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>:
> Hi all guys,
>
> time ago Robert and I were discussing about versioning the produced
> minified css/js to avoid browser cache conflicts, I mean, ATM all
> fluido skin versions refer to
>
> $relativePath/js/apache-maven-fluido.min.js
> $relativePath/js/apache-maven-fluido.min.cs
>
> that could cheat users when upgrading skins, since they could have
> been cached by the browser and while rendering the site, the old
> css/js could be used.
>
> I think it would be good versioning the produced resources according
> to the current fluido skin version, such as
>
> $relativePath/js/apache-maven-fluido-${project.version}.min.js
> $relativePath/js/apache-maven-fluido-${project.version}.min.cs
>
> WDYT?
Definitely +1 !
+1
yes, as anything in life, versioning is a requirement (when two
versions can exist :)).
tony.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
