Yes, and sorry again for a bit of hectic handling of this. After I triggered the vote on Friday, over the weekend I realised I want
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MINDEXER-62 in too, but was unable to sit in front of my machine (kids and family programme). As MINDEXER-62 it introduces a new artifact (indexer-cli), I did not want to do that in a "dot release" (subsequent of 5.x) or to defer it to 6.x even, as I already had the changes in my own fork. After reading the page on URL Stuart pasted, I came to same conclusion as he did, that I as "individual serving as release manager" am able to withdraw the vote, even if it looks strange, as the voting passed. As Olivier stated, that's not "nice" to people who invested time in testing before putting votes, but I have to emphasise, that MINDEXER-62 is merely about _move out_ of two CLI related classes -- anyway "dead code", when indexer-core embedded and used as library -- no other code change happened. So, I'd say that what Milos tested in Netbeans should still stand for example. Again, am sorry for this mess. Thanks, ~t~ On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Stuart McCulloch <mccu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 Sep 2012, at 00:42, Chris Graham wrote: > > > If the vote has been held and passed, can you withdraw it? I didn't think > > that you could. > > FWIW, from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html: > > "Generally the community will cancel the release vote if anyone > identifies serious problems, but in most cases the ultimate decision, lies > with the individual serving as release manager." > > This suggests whoever is serving as release manager can decide to cancel > and re-spin a given release ( it also says "The specifics of the process > may vary from project to project"... ) > > > -Chris > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net > >wrote: > > > >> Yup, I realised this too late, that am at wrong thread. Sorry about the > >> confusion. > >> > >> Anyway, I am withdrawing the vote anyway. > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> ~t~ > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >>> AFAIK vote thread is here http://markmail.org/message/hcrmm2v3pumhzwnh > >>> And PASSED !!! > >>> > >>> IMHO Here was a thread discussion not a vote. > >>> > >>> 2012/9/17 Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net>: > >>>> Thanks for everyone participating this forum and hijacking the voting! > >>>> > >>>> I call this vote closed and failed failed: no votes happened at > >>>> all. Binaries are dropped, will rollback the SVN too in any moment. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> ~t~ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Olivier Lamy > >>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com > >>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
