no objections from me. 2012/10/6 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>: > The dependency we currently have is EPL and the "replacement" is EPL so I > don't see the need to vote. Only if the license was changing or if we were > moving from eclipse to a non-foundation hosted artifact would I see the > need for a vote. > > In any case I think we can hold back the decision until the release vote > unless people see the risk of rollback as too high > > Our original intent in voting to accept the EPL licensed aether from > sonatype was that the eclipse one was taking too long, so I viewed the vote > as being both to take the eclipse one AND pragmatically take the sonatype > one until eclipse had a release. > > If others viewed it differently, they really should shout out now, or -1 > the commit > > On Saturday, 6 October 2012, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > >> Aether 0.9.0.M1 is now in central [1] >> and Benjamin did the upgrade on his own Maven 3 branch [2] >> >> Question: do we need a formal vote for the upgrade of this dependency? >> Any objection to do the upgrade without vote, given it's just a new home >> for a >> compoennt we already use? >> >> Regards, >> >> Hervé >> >> [1] http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/eclipse/aether/ >> >> [2] https://github.com/bentmann/maven-3 >> >> Le dimanche 30 septembre 2012 17:04:41 Jason van Zyl a écrit : >> > I'm working on the Aether Ant Tasks and in order to make them work with >> the >> > new Eclipse release of Aether I had to start refactoring the the core -- >> > maven-aether-provider specifically -- in order to make them work. If no >> one >> > objects to using a milestone from Eclipse then I will make the changes in >> > the core to use the Eclipse Aether, otherwise I can keep my branch and >> > rebase when an official release comes out and merge it then. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Jason >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------- >> > Jason van Zyl >> > Founder & CTO, Sonatype >> > Founder, Apache Maven >> > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >> > --------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > A party which is not afraid of letting culture, >> > business, and welfare go to ruin completely can >> > be omnipotent for a while. >> > >> > -- Jakob Burckhardt >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;> >> >>
-- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
