On 11 October 2012 10:19, ceki <c...@qos.ch> wrote: > On 11.10.2012 10:24, Anders Hammar wrote: > >> Just to get this clear in my head: >> When you're talking about "slf4j dependency" in a plugin, are you >> talking about dependency to slf4j-api or an slf4j impl? >> > > A plugin declaring a dependency on slf4j-api without declaring a > dependency on an implementation does not makes sense imo. It follows > that the term "declaring a dependency on slf4j" means a dependency on > both slf4j-api as well as a binding, aka implementation. >
SINCE 1.6.0 As of SLF4J version 1.6, in the absence of a binding, SLF4J will default to a no-operation (NOP) logger implementation. A plugin might just want to shunt the logs to null and so use the side-effect of the NOP logger > /Anders >> > > -- > Ceki > 65% of statistics are made up on the spot > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.**org<dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
