On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Jesse McConnell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote: >> Here's my suggestion: >> >> We keep the current state where we have the new logging API (slf4j) and the >> System.out style implementation. Then we (Olivier?) create a JIRA ticket >> for moving to a different logging implementation using a more flexible >> logging framework. Then we discuss the benefits of doing that move. We >> could even ask the users if it is something that people even want. >> > > +1 that sounds reasonable and is akin to what we do in jetty, though > our stdout impl has even less brains and only gets its brains when > slf4j-api is detected in classpath > > cheers, > jesse
+1 Good plan. And having used it similarly, slf4j-simple is a good, small, default logger choice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
