I'm fine with RCs. Though looking at the download counts for the plugins that changed between the versions not much happened during the RCs. I made the assumption people actually look at them, but they don't. If someone has access to the direct download counts of the distributions that can be validated. I would love it if people checked, sadly empirically it looks like they don't.
Your call. If RCs functioned as intended they would be great, I don't believe they do. On Nov 25, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Kristian Rosenvold <kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201112.mbox/%3cdba1210a-2ea7-4dde-8286-5ff3af5ec...@tesla.io%3E > > Kristian > > > 2012/11/25 Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io>: >> Hi, >> >> Here is a link to Jira with 30 issues resolved: >> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967 >> >> Staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-072/ >> >> The specific binaries for testing can be found here: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-072/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.1.0/ >> >> Staging site: >> http://maven.apache.org >> >> The documentation specifically for this release pertains to JSR330 and >> SLF4J-based logging: >> http://maven.apache.org/maven-jsr330.html >> http://maven.apache.org/maven-logging.html >> >> Vote open for 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jason >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Jason van Zyl >> Founder & CTO, Sonatype >> Founder, Apache Maven >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> >> People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples. >> Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without >> actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one >> is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by >> looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more examples >> you look at, the more general your framework will be. >> >> -- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks >> >> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder & CTO, Sonatype Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl --------------------------------------------------------- People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples. Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more examples you look at, the more general your framework will be. -- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks
