2012/12/1 Gary Gregory <[email protected]>: > Log4j2 supports color consoles, even on Windows. Is this support > incomplete? I know, I know,still in beta. sometimes version naming doesn't have a real added value (IMHO)
some projects use 0.1.x model without any alpha/beta qualifier some others use beta/alpha qualifier so frankly it's a just sometimes a "marketing" choice :-) Hey we lived here very long with something called plexus-container-default 1.0-alpha-x and we released a lot of versions of maven 2.x with that :-) > > Gary > > On Dec 1, 2012, at 5:05, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> sounds great, have Oliviers branch running locally myself without issues. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]> >>> To: Maven Developers List <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2012 9:17 AM >>> Subject: Re: Re-spinning 3.1.0 >>> >>> Hi Jason, >>> >>> Couldn't we have a look at olamy's log4j2 branch to see if we could >>> sanitize / merge it to propose at least one change for the end user >>> and demonstrate the interest of the change about logs : a colorized >>> console. >>> >>> I remember you did that in mvnsh/teslashell a long time ago (as an >>> extension ?) and perhaps it could be easy to add properly this feature >>> in 3.1.0 (otherwise it won't be before a 3.2.0). >>> >>> Myself I'm using a 3.1.0 fork with this patch and I' m really >>> satisfied (it's so good to quickly see highlighted warning and errors >>> ). I merged it back in the last 3.1.0 tag you did without issue >>> >>> Wdyt? >>> >>> --------- >>> Arnaud >>> >>> Le 1 déc. 2012 à 00:20, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>>> I'm done with the issues that cropped up so I'm ready to re-spin >>> 3.1.0. >>>> >>>> Anyone want to add anything or discuss anything before I spin this? I'm >>> not in any rush so if folks want to talk about logging we can. But given the >>> fact once SLF4J initializes it can't change the implementation plugins >>> integrating with Maven need to use the implementation we choose. This is how >>> everything else in the world that integrates SLF4J has to operate so I don't >>> really see us being any different. >>>> >>>> I'll wait until tomorrow to re-spin. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Jason >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Jason van Zyl >>>> Founder & CTO, Sonatype >>>> Founder, Apache Maven >>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >>>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
