Brian, can you point me to any thread of that discussion?

I'm not going to pick up the conversational gambit of what the policy
*should* be; I'm already neck deep in that on another thread and I
don't think it will help anyone to start a mirror image of it here.


On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Brian Fox <bri...@infinity.nu> wrote:
> Further to that, no one will ever consume maven plugins from a random dist
> folder anyway, so a policy that requires this is a paper policy only and
> would have no basis in the reality of how these particular projects are
> consumed.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Brian Fox <bri...@infinity.nu> wrote:
>
>> The last discussion of this required the production of proper source
>> bundles for voting, which we created at that time. I don't recall there
>> being any requirement that everything go onto dist.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Benson Margulies 
>> <bimargul...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Dear fellow community members,
>>>
>>> The current official documentation for Apache releases calls for all
>>> releases to be copied to the 'dist' area.
>>>
>>> We don't do that for poms and plugins. We just push a source release
>>> zip to repository.apache.org.
>>>
>>> Can anyone here help me out by finding a historical thread of
>>> discussion that approved this plan of attack?
>>>
>>> I'm setting out to edit the official page to memorialize this policy
>>> for the benefit of other projects, and I'm getting pushback.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to