In general, I think that the default value should be whatever works in most cases. Then we could have params for tweaking this (for better performance e.g. in specific cases), but it would be up to the user to do this. So, in this specific case, I think the default should be to recompress so that it always works even though it might be a bit slower.
/Anders On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Kristian Rosenvold < kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: > A lot of you seemed to have realized that the latest version of war and > assembly have chosen the "fast" option over the "compact" option; and you > actually seem to like it ;) > > https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-639 has been filed and "fixed" > which will revert the behaviour back to "slow" for both war and assembly, > So what do you think ? > > > Kristian >
