+1
On 4 July 2013 20:35, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>wrote: > I am withdrawing my -1 on the basis of the feedback I have received from > legal-discuss. > > My vote is now +0 as I have not tested the distribution and I am waiting > for somebody else on the PMC to do the running and make a call on whether > we need to fix the NOTICE file for this release. > > I intend testing the distribution tomorrow unless this vote gets cancelled > ;-) > > - Stephen > > > On Thursday, 4 July 2013, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> Fair enough. >> >> On Jul 4, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Stephen Connolly < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I will let Barrie decide on whether we *have to* cancel this vote >> because >> > of the issues he identified in the NOTICE file. >> > >> > Until I hear back from legal-discuss, I do not know whether the test >> data >> > issue has any changes required, so I do not know whether (on the bits I >> am >> > focusing) there is a requirement for us to respin yet, so from my point >> of >> > view I am ok with keeping the vote open until I hear back from >> > legal-discuss on the test data issue... but if Barrie's view is that >> with >> > the current NOTICE we cannot release, then no choice but to cancel the >> vote >> > now. >> > >> > I'd rather have a vote open to pester legal for a more prompt answer >> (from >> > a bunch of volunteers on the 4th of July weekend) than have no vote to >> push >> > them with. >> > >> > >> > On 4 July 2013 13:54, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Then just make the changes you see fit and I'll roll it again. It will >> >> only take a few minutes. If we know what it should be like then we >> might as >> >> well just do it, as it's likely to take less time than asking if an >> >> exception can be made. >> >> >> >> I can cancel the vote. Make the changes you think are required for >> >> compliance and I'll cut it again. >> >> >> >> On Jul 4, 2013, at 6:05 AM, Stephen Connolly < >> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I have asked the legal-discuss list for an opinion on test data sets >> and >> >>> license headers. From my reading of the current ASF position: >> >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions we do not >> >>> currently have an exception for test data sets. >> >>> >> >>> Pending the outcome of that discussion I will have to be >> >>> >> >>> -1 >> >>> >> >>> If the outcome is that we do not need to do anything for test data >> sets, >> >>> then I would be happy to switch to +1. >> >>> >> >>> If the outcome is that we need to add some additional text to the >> NOTICE >> >>> files to cover the test data sets, then we will need to respin as >> nobody >> >> on >> >>> the PMC can vote +1 if we are aware that the release is in violation >> of >> >> the >> >>> ASF policies and we would be neglecting our governance role. >> >>> >> >>> If the outcome is that we need to add the license headers to all the >> test >> >>> data files, then I think the PMC will have to review what we want to >> do >> >> as >> >>> adding license headers to every file in the test data set runs the >> risk >> >> of >> >>> invalidating the test data and that is an unnecessary risk that would >> >>> cripple the project and as such I would be looking for the ASF to >> change >> >>> such a decision and provide us with a means of using the NOTICE file >> to >> >>> cover the test data. >> >>> >> >>> I hate being petty, but unfortunately that is part of the governance >> role >> >>> that the PMC is tasked with... :-( >> >>> >> >>> - Stephen >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 1 July 2013 03:56, Barrie Treloar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> On 1 July 2013 06:52, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> Another problem: the NOTICE file contains the following spurious >> text: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> ========================================================================= >> >>>>> == NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of >> >>>> == >> >>>>> == the Apache License, Version 2.0, >> >>>> == >> >>>>> == in this case for the Apache Maven distribution. >> >>>> == >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> ========================================================================= >> >>>>We know what we are, but know not what we may be. >> >> -- Shakespeare >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Sent from my phone >
