Sorry about that. I did register the issue and I'll make something to generate 
the correct attributions for the next release. Hopefully the next one will not 
take 7 months. I sent the first email out for the first 3.1.0 on December 2nd, 
2012 :-)

On Jul 13, 2013, at 10:00 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 13 July 2013 14:54, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The vote has passed with the following:
>> 
>> +1 Binding: Arnaud, Stephen, Olivier, Hervé
>> +1 Non-binding: Stevo, Anders, Tony, Tamas, Baptiste, Mark, Mirko
> 
> I voted -1 (non-binding) because of the invalid NOTICE file (amongst
> other reasons).
> 
>> 
>> I'll promote the release in Nexus and update the docs and announce Monday 
>> when it's all done.
>> 
>> On Jun 30, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Jason van Zyl <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Here are the release bits for 3.1.0:
>>> 
>>> Release notes:
>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=18967
>>> 
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-084/
>>> 
>>> Staged distribution:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-084/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.1.0/
>>> 
>>> Staged Site:
>>> http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.1.0
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Jason
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>> Jason van Zyl
>>> Founder,  Apache Maven
>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're 
>>> talking about.
>>> 
>>> -- John von Neumann
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Jason
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> Jason van Zyl
>> Founder,  Apache Maven
>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples.
>> Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without
>> actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one
>> is that smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by
>> looking at the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more examples
>> you look at, the more general your framework will be.
>> 
>>  -- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
---------------------------------------------------------

A man enjoys his work when he understands the whole and when he
is responsible for the quality of the whole

 -- Christopher Alexander, A Pattern Language






Reply via email to