Hi Stephen, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> On 27 August 2013 10:55, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@scalaris.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Stephen, >> >> In consequence this will also implicitly drop (transitive) dependency >> manipulations with profiles. >> >> > Yes, a "good thing" in my opinion ;-) Definitely, although I'd love to adjust sometimes dependencies based on the target JDK. Nevertheless, the current profile mechanism is not usable for dependencies. >> However, all makes sense now to me - thanks for explaining. >> > > Just my vision... I don't have any greater authority than any other > committer with respect to the direction we actually end up choosing to > follow... but that is how I thing we could square the circle... It's definitely a step into the right direction to move forward with the least impact on existing stuff. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
