On 12/16/2013, 5:27, Olivier Lamy wrote:
+/** >+ * Extension point that allows build extensions observe and possibly veto mojo executions. >+ * >+ * @see WeakMojoExecutionListener >+ * @since 3.1.2 >+ * @provisional This interface is part of work in progress and can be changed or removed without notice. >+ */ >+public interface MojoExecutionListener >+{ >+ public void beforeMojoExecution( MavenSession session, MavenProject project, MojoExecution execution, Mojo mojo ) >+ throws MojoExecutionException; >+ >+ public void afterMojoExecutionSuccess( MavenSession session, MavenProject project, MojoExecution execution, >+ Mojo mojo ) >+ throws MojoExecutionException; >+ >+ public void afterExecutionFailure( MavenSession session, MavenProject project, MojoExecution execution, Mojo mojo, >+ Throwable cause ); >+}I wonder if it will be easier for future enhancement to use a bean with fields for those objects. MojoExecutionListenerEvent with getMavenSession() etc... Maybe will be simpler to add getter to this bean than changing the signature of the interface. ?
Good idea. Any objections against MojoExecutionEvent and ProjectExecutionEvent names? -- Regards, Igor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
