+1 On the original name I just made another IT and it's definitely much clearer with the JIRA id and a short blurb. I see this as an improvement.
On Jan 6, 2014, at 7:51 AM, Igor Fedorenko <[email protected]> wrote: > Stephen, > > I would prefer to keep the original test name, i.e. > mng5530-mojo-execution-scope. Having both the JIRA issue id and short > description of the test makes it much easier to understand what the test > is supposed to do and still be able to find any additional information > if needed. > > Can you explain what problems you see with the original test name? > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-integration-testing.git;a=commit;h=d4f4d4009d23a77254c20d4c2c8a2b8eccc91e47 > > -- > Regards, > Igor > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl ---------------------------------------------------------
