The following issues I proposed to move to 4.x. I have not heard anything to the contrary... shall I pull the trigger on these?
- http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4622 Throw Validation Error if pom contains a dependency with two different versions. - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-683 Lifecycle mappings should specify phase bindings in terms of general functionality type - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-841 Support customization of default excludes - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-193 symmetry for outputs of a plugin - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3695 Allow dependencies' scopes to be managed without explicit versions - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3825 Dependencies with classifier should not always require a version. - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3321 Skip plugin and/or execution - - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1569 Make build process info read-only to mojos, and provide mechanism for explicit out-params for mojos to declare - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1867 deprecate system scope, analyse other use cases - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4508 No way to avoid adding artifactId to site urls I would like some discussion on this one before making a call one way or the other - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4173 Remove automatic version resolution for POM plugins On 13 January 2014 18:02, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>wrote: > wiki updated ;-) > > > On 13 January 2014 17:56, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Done. >> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Benson Margulies >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Stephen Connolly >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 13 January 2014 16:13, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Why isn't this copied to the dev list? >> >> >> >> >> >> It was, check the headers >> > >> > I see. GMail has learned a new prank, which is to skip 'dev' in the >> > brief listing of who is on the email. >> > >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I don't see why http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3879 is even >> >>> remotely under consideration. >> >> >> >> >> >> I moved MNG-3879 to 4.0 backlog. >> >> >> >> Your action was to split out the second issue... should really live in >> the >> >> dependency plugin and depend on MNG-3879 >> > >> > OK, seems less that wildly important, but I'll do it. >> > >> >> >> >>> The second part is a goal that I would propose to call >> 'dependency-map'. >> >>> This would produce a formatted map of the dependency tree – enriched, >> of >> >>> course, by the comments in the first part. >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> It is a proposal, to start with, to add >> >>> an element to the POM: >> >>> >> >>> <dependency> >> >>> <explanation>some text </explanation> >> >>> ... >> >>> </dependency> >> >>> >> >>> which would make it a job for 4.0. It was never my intention to >> >>> propose to capture <!-- --> XML comments, that's evil in my view. >> >>> >> >>> So far, the feedback I've received is that the stuff I've written >> >>> about POM evolution is crap. Fine, it's crap. >> >> >> >> >> >> I don't think necessarily so... once 3.2.0 is out we will be looking at >> >> model version 5.0.0 and pom evolution is on the cards. I like the idea >> of >> >> dedicated documentation nodes in the pom as otherwise it can be harder >> to >> >> maintain comments etc, when people use formatting tools etc. The great >> thing >> >> with a descriptive text node is that everyone except tooling can >> ignore it >> >> >> >>> >> >>> So JIRAs like this >> >>> should just be closed down when they have my name on them. >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Stephen Connolly >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > I have added a wiki page summary of this discussion: >> >>> > >> >>> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.2.0+Bug+Scrub >> >>> > >> >>> > Reminder, I pegged some action items against Benson, Olivier, >> Kristian & >> >>> > Jason... See the action required section... mostly just status >> updates. >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On 7 January 2014 22:03, Stephen Connolly >> >>> > <[email protected]> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I like "Nike" style issues (just commit it) >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Am 2014-01-07 22:38, schrieb Stephen Connolly: >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Add it if you promise to implement it, otherwise put it against >> 3.2.x >> >>> >>>> for >> >>> >>>> the patch releases. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> That is not going to be a problem because I have a patch and can >> >>> >>> commit >> >>> >>> right away. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> On Tuesday, 7 January 2014, Michael Osipov wrote: >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>>> Am 2014-01-07 16:25, schrieb Stephen Connolly: >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> OK we are now at 38 open issues.... anyone else feel like >> scrubbing >> >>> >>>>>> some >> >>> >>>>>> more? >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> I'd like to add another issue to 3.2: >> >>> >>>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5176 Print build times in >> an >> >>> >>>>> ISO >> >>> >>>>> 8601-style manner >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> It adds readability to the time output. >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> Mike >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> Sent from my phone >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >> > >
