Hello, I am afraid the only documentation is in the ticket, right now. I could try to find a place this evening and submit a patch.
Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Jan 24, 2014 11:31 PM, "Karl Heinz Marbaise" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Robert, > Hi Mirko, > > > > Indeed, I couldn't remember the reason for 1.4 (nor with a quick scan > >> through Jira), but this was it. >> > > Thanks for the hint... > > Ok. i will move the issues to 1.4 ...so new functionality is definitely > a good reason for 1.4 instead of 1.3.2 ... > > So MENFORCER-160 is implemented based on a quick dive into the code (and > based on your hints) and MENFORCER-159 not...so i remove MENFORCER-159 from > the view for 1.4 release... > > > Thanks for clearing up things... > > BTW: Do you know if the new behaviour is documented for the user somewhere > ? I couldn't find something...may be lose sight of it..... > > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz > > > >> Robert >> >> Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:30:38 +0100 schreef Mirko Friedenhagen >> <[email protected]>: >> >> Karl Heinz, >>> >>> another thing: because MENFORCER-160 introduces a new interface which >>> is implemented by AbstractStandardEnforcerRule maybe version 1.4 would >>> be a better version number than 1.3.2, as it introduces a new >>> functionality. >>> Regards Mirko >>> -- >>> http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ >>> https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) >>> https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Karl Heinz, >>>> >>>> one thing: MENFORCER-159 is a duplicate of MENFORCER-160 (or better it >>>> is an alternative approach), so probably should not be mentioned. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Mirko >>>> Regards Mirko >>>> -- >>>> http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ >>>> https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) >>>> https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Robert Scholte >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Karl Heinz, >>>>> >>>>> you might hit MENFORCER-161[1], unless Hervé did a fix regarding the >>>>> scm-publish on this project. >>>>> >>>>> Robert >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-161 >>>>> >>>>> Op Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:22:59 +0100 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise >>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> i just want to know on what basis releases will be created... >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently i would suggest to create a Release 1.3.2 of the >>>>>> maven-enforcer-plugin... >>>>>> >>>>>> In Jira the list >>>>>> >>>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? >>>>>> projectId=11530&version=19935 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> for 1.3.2 contains a number of bug fixes... >>>>>> >>>>>> Are there any objections to get a release 1.3.2 out of the door... >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to fix one or two more issues...but i want to know how >>>>>> the >>>>>> mood is about creating a new release of Maven-Enforcer-Plugin.... >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind Regards >>>>>> Karl Heinz Marbaise >>>>>> >>>>> > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
