The SVN repo should probably be retained anyway, just in RO format, and with a new URL that indicates it shouldn't be used. You can try to retain all history, but it's never quite in the same form, really. Perhaps no one cares, though?
+1 for decompose into individual repos. Fred. PS, perhaps one day we'll meet, who knows. :-p On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Jason van Zyl <ja...@takari.io> wrote: > Probably a little more decompose like a repository for each plugin and > shared component. No reason all history can't be retained. > > On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:03 PM, Mark Derricutt <m...@talios.com> wrote: > > > Do you envisage one master git repo, or multiple repositories for each > moveable piece? > > > > Full history retainment? > > > > On 13 Feb 2014, at 16:37, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > >> Can we start the process of converting everything to Git. I don't > really see any benefit in using Subversion any longer. > >> > >> If so then we should just get together for a day and convert them and > then get infra to use what we converted to do the flip. > >> > >> Jason (who would be happy to never execute svn again) > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > http://twitter.com/takari_io > --------------------------------------------------------- > > To do two things at once is to do neither. > > -- Publilius Syrus, Roman slave, first century B.C. > > > > > > > > > >
