-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16839/#review31774
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/16839/#comment60496>

    Also, consider moving all http related functions to src/http.cpp


- Jie Yu


On Jan. 14, 2014, 7:02 p.m., Charlie Carson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/16839/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 14, 2014, 7:02 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, Jeff Currier, and Jie 
> Yu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-902
>     
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-902
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
>    Add post function to http.hpp of libprocess.
> 
>     This adds the post equivalent of the get function to http.hpp.
> 
>     The existing get method is refactored into internal::httpRequest
>     with arguments for method, query, and body.
> 
>     The get and post functions can then be implemented as simple
>     wrapper of internal::httpRequest.
> 
>     There are also new unit tests to verify the existing behavior of
>     get and the new post behavior.
> 
>     See:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-902
> 
>     Review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16839
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/http.hpp 
> 5bdd520c9e0bcc0a2d3a4554cc4ced99dcf78b51 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/process.cpp 
> 2d193b13cde92a061b02f903a5d6471ff90cb12a 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/tests/http_tests.cpp 
> 68d1a1b2ed5645d861b1e613aed9731368ebdc6a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16839/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> added new unit tests
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Charlie Carson
> 
>

Reply via email to