> On Jan. 28, 2014, 5:08 a.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote: > > src/slave/http.cpp, line 309 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/17443/diff/1/?file=452630#file452630line309> > > > > Any reason not to use 'active_tasks' here instead of 'launched_tasks' > > too?
I went back and forth on the naming. This is my current thinking. active_tasks on master = (queued_tasks + launched_tasks) on slaves. calling them launched_tasks on the master seemed a bit confusing because it has a different meaning on the slave. thoughts? - Vinod ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17443/#review32953 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 28, 2014, 3:02 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/17443/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 28, 2014, 3:02 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, David > Robinson, and Niklas Nielsen. > > > Bugs: MESOS-772 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-772 > > > Repository: mesos-git > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/slave/http.cpp c8357e214d2adf2cd712072f58d07b07badb79dc > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17443/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make > > > Thanks, > > Vinod Kone > >
